neonicotinoides
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| neonicotinoides [2015/11/03 11:32] – ami | neonicotinoides [2016/01/13 17:48] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| http:// | http:// | ||
| - | Homeostase / heat regulation | + | **Homeostase / heat regulation |
| - | Cell architecture / geometrical forms | + | Cell architecture / geometrical forms** |
| => 2 important elements for the metamorphose of the larvae over pop to adult bee (imago). | => 2 important elements for the metamorphose of the larvae over pop to adult bee (imago). | ||
| To go through this transformation, | To go through this transformation, | ||
| The honey (from fluid to solid) stands for transformation and the honeycomb, with its perfect form, stands for the perfect relationship matter/ | The honey (from fluid to solid) stands for transformation and the honeycomb, with its perfect form, stands for the perfect relationship matter/ | ||
| A honeycomb based on hexagons is a very efficient design. A tiling based on regular hexagons divides the plane into equal-area cells with the minimal perimeters. The bees, therefore, minimize the use of wax in the cell walls. The bottoms of the honeycomb are efficient, but not the optimal configuration. A cell bottom shaped like **a truncated octahedron** has less surface area than one shaped like a rhombic dodecahedron. | A honeycomb based on hexagons is a very efficient design. A tiling based on regular hexagons divides the plane into equal-area cells with the minimal perimeters. The bees, therefore, minimize the use of wax in the cell walls. The bottoms of the honeycomb are efficient, but not the optimal configuration. A cell bottom shaped like **a truncated octahedron** has less surface area than one shaped like a rhombic dodecahedron. | ||
neonicotinoides.1446550345.txt.gz · Last modified: 2016/01/13 17:46 (external edit)